![bcftools mpileup - Difference between IDV and FORMAT/AD* fields · Issue #912 · samtools/bcftools · GitHub bcftools mpileup - Difference between IDV and FORMAT/AD* fields · Issue #912 · samtools/bcftools · GitHub](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/1049501/47922116-992bd180-deb6-11e8-82ee-a393d644d41a.png)
bcftools mpileup - Difference between IDV and FORMAT/AD* fields · Issue #912 · samtools/bcftools · GitHub
![Variant calling using NGS and sequence capture data for population and evolutionary genomic inferences in Norway Spruce (Picea abies) | bioRxiv Variant calling using NGS and sequence capture data for population and evolutionary genomic inferences in Norway Spruce (Picea abies) | bioRxiv](https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2019/10/15/805994/F2.large.jpg)
Variant calling using NGS and sequence capture data for population and evolutionary genomic inferences in Norway Spruce (Picea abies) | bioRxiv
Possible to annotate the FILTER from an annotation VCF file, as an INFO/TAG in the target? · Issue #1187 · samtools/bcftools · GitHub
PLOS Genetics: No unexpected CRISPR-Cas9 off-target activity revealed by trio sequencing of gene-edited mice
![Comparison of error rates of BCFtools/RoH and other existing methods as... | Download Scientific Diagram Comparison of error rates of BCFtools/RoH and other existing methods as... | Download Scientific Diagram](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292389458/figure/fig1/AS:330557260091404@1455822400439/Comparison-of-error-rates-of-BCFtools-RoH-and-other-existing-methods-as-well-as.png)